The Torah's eighty-six literary units were composed as
two-dimensional tables. This is the working record of an argument that their
arrangement was designed in dialogue with the Egyptian Book of Gates — the composition
painted on the walls of New Kingdom royal tombs.
The work is unfinished and published as it proceeds. Findings are
recorded with their evidence, and failures are kept on the record alongside them.
Corrections and collaboration are welcome — see the note at the foot of this page.
The book
The argument as continuous prose, for a general reader.
Who Composed the Torah? — working draftSixteen chapters, read in the browser. The Torah's units set out as
tables the reader can look at, the divine names tracked across them, and the tomb wall
brought alongside. Incomplete: the chapter on the Book of Gates itself is not yet
written, because the research it rests on is still under way.A draft, and it will change. Also available as
source markdown.
Start here
Three views of the structure, each readable without preparation.
The Wall MapThe Book of Gates' twelve hours in their three registers, with the
Torah's three horizontal books set beneath them, station by station in one aligned
scroll.
The Torah MapAll eighty-six units of the Five Books on a single plan — the
horizontal axis of time across Genesis, Leviticus and Deuteronomy, the vertical axis
of place through Exodus and Numbers.
Hours and RegistersScene counts per register in the Book of Gates set against the
row-and-column format of the Torah units that face them.
The Parallels ExplorerBrowse the evidence by unit or by hour. Certified findings can be
filtered from proposed ones; withdrawn findings stay visible by default.
The record
Every claim, its evidence, and its current standing.
A Reader's Map of the ParallelsThe whole comparison in prose, hour by hour. The place to begin if
you would rather read than browse.
The Parallels DatabaseThe full machine-readable record. Also as
a spreadsheet, and filtered to certified
findings only in JSON and
spreadsheet form.Derived from the ledger; regenerated at milestones, so it can lag
the ledger between builds.
The Hour LedgerThe primary research file. Every entry carries who proposed it,
what source it rests on, and whether it is certified, proposed, withdrawn, or read as
an inversion. Struck entries are never deleted.Large. A working document, not a finished one.
The Second-Pass MethodWhat counts as evidence here: the layers of comparison, the
standard a finding must meet, and how an inversion is treated.
Ceiling and Floor — working notesThe open question of whether Exodus and Numbers answer to the
Egyptian sky books as the wall books answer to the Book of Gates. Staging notes,
corrections included.
Published papers
Peer-reviewed work and progress reports.
Moshe Kline on Academia.eduWhere the papers and progress reports are posted, including the
structural studies of Genesis, Leviticus and Deuteronomy that the comparison rests
on.
An open request. This argument reaches into Egyptology, and its author
is not an Egyptologist. The description of the Book of Gates given here has been drawn
from Hornung and Abt's edition at first hand, but it has not been reviewed by a
specialist, and it will not go into print without one. If you read Egyptian material and
are willing to tell us where we have it wrong, that correction is the most useful thing
anyone could contribute. Credit is offered for any correction made.
Contact.